<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8221;Weak Ties&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrislott.org/story/weak-ties/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrislott.org/story/weak-ties/</link>
	<description>Musings on education, techology, and life..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AP</title>
		<link>http://chrislott.org/story/weak-ties/comment-page-1/#comment-158</link>
		<dc:creator>AP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2004 10:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrislott.org/?p=356#comment-158</guid>
		<description>This is a good post. There is a whole class of people who make a living on computers while at the same time feeling ambivalent about computers, and they should be first into the public square. Actually, I preferred a previous line of yours, &quot;The Aching Luddite&quot;- a good title for a weblog.&lt;br /&gt;
    &lt;br /&gt;
Whats needed most of all is a way, a canon, to deal with the smallness the internet engenders into mass society. The best nonfiction book of last year, Curtis White&#039;s &quot;The Middle Mind&quot;(Called &#8220;Cogent, acute, beautiful, merciless, and true&#8221; by the beloved David Foster Wallace) was a good start in forming this kind of outlook and a good twin to Morris Berman&#039;s &quot;The Twilight of American Culture.&quot; A good developing way to go about this would be in building an internet canon: not just mindless cyberpunk, but books which help the critical mind cope in the internet age. I would suggest these titles:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood&lt;br /&gt;
Idlewild by Nick Sagan&lt;br /&gt;
The Human Stain by Phillip Roth&lt;br /&gt;
After Dachau by Daniel Quinn&lt;br /&gt;
The Egg Code by Mike Heppner&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is just fiction since non-fiction would not be so easy to make into a canon.  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a good post. There is a whole class of people who make a living on computers while at the same time feeling ambivalent about computers, and they should be first into the public square. Actually, I preferred a previous line of yours, &#8220;The Aching Luddite&#8221;- a good title for a weblog.</p>
<p>Whats needed most of all is a way, a canon, to deal with the smallness the internet engenders into mass society. The best nonfiction book of last year, Curtis White&#8217;s &#8220;The Middle Mind&#8221;(Called &#8220;Cogent, acute, beautiful, merciless, and true&#8221; by the beloved David Foster Wallace) was a good start in forming this kind of outlook and a good twin to Morris Berman&#8217;s &#8220;The Twilight of American Culture.&#8221; A good developing way to go about this would be in building an internet canon: not just mindless cyberpunk, but books which help the critical mind cope in the internet age. I would suggest these titles:</p>
<p>Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood<br />
Idlewild by Nick Sagan<br />
The Human Stain by Phillip Roth<br />
After Dachau by Daniel Quinn<br />
The Egg Code by Mike Heppner</p>
<p>This is just fiction since non-fiction would not be so easy to make into a canon.  </p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
