”Weak Ties”
My thanks to Lauren of “Him, Them and Me” for a timely pointer to an article with real relevance to me at the moment: Jim Moore’s piece “A Theoretical Note on Why Blogs Matter: The Strength of Weak Ties”.
It’s obvious that I’ve been silent here lately for quite a while (close to two months now!) and I’ve appreciated the notes of concern and queries about when I will return. The truth is, my desire to post here– like my enthusiasm for technology in general– is cyclical. The latest downturn has been the most severe yet. Over the last few months I have, to the extent possible given the nature of my job, just about stopped using computers and the internet altogether. When I feel able to write, I use pen and paper. When I want to communicate, I send a letter. When I want to read, I find a book. Research takes me to the library rather than the keyboard.
I get physically weary just thinking about weblogs and email and websites and search engines. Even posting this short note is somehow draining me of some small store of vital energy. It’s hard to figure.
Or maybe not so hard. Perhaps my initial enthusiasm for the Internet, the web, and what they could do for art and communication and construction of self has led to a simple case of burnout. It’s happened to far better people than myself.
The more troubling issue is that I similarly seem to have lost my “taste” for just about everything that used to occupy my mind night and day before now. I’d suspect the malaise that comes with a deep depression except that I generally feel pretty good about things. I just have no ambition, no enthusiasm, no excitement about poetry, music, reading, writing.
This all started not long after my birthday late last year, so perhaps there is a connection. I think I’ve simply grown tired of being a Jack-of-All-Trades kind of person. I want to discover (or rediscover) a passion that can drive me with a single-minded desire to know and do more. Maybe this is what everyone wants. Or maybe I have a flawed psyche, finding a way to envy the obsessive collector striving to complete his collection with that one last record or book or fountain pen, discovering I am jealous of the lonely author who has so much to say and only one lifetime to say it.
I can’t make myself have a new sense of purpose any more than I could just tell myself to have a new religious conviction or wake up one day and decide I am going to like the taste of tamarind hard candy.
I need to figure out what has changed. Who this pale impostor is
pecking away at my keyboard. If there is solace to be found in writing a poem or reading a book; if there is some succor available in delving into my jazz collection or spinning Eric Dolphy at the Five Spot; if there are any nutrients left in the dried out carcass of my old aspirations and sense of purpose, I hope that my clawing, scrabbling hands discover it before I wholly waste away.

January 15th, 2004 at 10:10 am
This is a good post. There is a whole class of people who make a living on computers while at the same time feeling ambivalent about computers, and they should be first into the public square. Actually, I preferred a previous line of yours, “The Aching Luddite”- a good title for a weblog.
Whats needed most of all is a way, a canon, to deal with the smallness the internet engenders into mass society. The best nonfiction book of last year, Curtis White’s “The Middle Mind”(Called “Cogent, acute, beautiful, merciless, and true” by the beloved David Foster Wallace) was a good start in forming this kind of outlook and a good twin to Morris Berman’s “The Twilight of American Culture.” A good developing way to go about this would be in building an internet canon: not just mindless cyberpunk, but books which help the critical mind cope in the internet age. I would suggest these titles:
Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood
Idlewild by Nick Sagan
The Human Stain by Phillip Roth
After Dachau by Daniel Quinn
The Egg Code by Mike Heppner
This is just fiction since non-fiction would not be so easy to make into a canon.