<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gatekeepers and Terminology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrislott.org/story/gatekeepers-and-terminology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrislott.org/story/gatekeepers-and-terminology/</link>
	<description>Musings on education, techology, and life..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 16:23:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: pingswept &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chrislott.org is smarter than I am</title>
		<link>http://chrislott.org/story/gatekeepers-and-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-531</link>
		<dc:creator>pingswept &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Chrislott.org is smarter than I am</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:07:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrislott.org/2006/02/18/gatekeepers-and-terminology/#comment-531</guid>
		<description>[...] Chris Lott has a great post responding to my last post about this gatekeeper business. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Chris Lott has a great post responding to my last post about this gatekeeper business. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon Stafford</title>
		<link>http://chrislott.org/story/gatekeepers-and-terminology/comment-page-1/#comment-530</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon Stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2006 23:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrislott.org/2006/02/18/gatekeepers-and-terminology/#comment-530</guid>
		<description>Well said, Chris Lott.org! I know you used my blog post as a example of disagreement, but you have stated my central point quite well: &quot;The issue here is that many in this debate use the term &#039;Gatekeeper&#039; when what they mean is &#039;powerful connector&#039; or something of that ilk.&quot; I&#039;m not disputing the shape of the long tail or the influence of Doc&#039;s link love-- the question is just whether, in your metaphor, who is driving the Ferrari. I claim that the drivers are Dave Sifry of Technorati and Page and Brin of Google, not Doc Searls. I also agree with your description of the desire behind the argument, the desire to have Searls (for example) &quot;recognize the influential power they have and the amount to which they tend to link inside their circle and that other worthy people donâ€™t get that link love.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, Chris Lott.org! I know you used my blog post as a example of disagreement, but you have stated my central point quite well: &#8220;The issue here is that many in this debate use the term &#8216;Gatekeeper&#8217; when what they mean is &#8216;powerful connector&#8217; or something of that ilk.&#8221; I&#8217;m not disputing the shape of the long tail or the influence of Doc&#8217;s link love&#8211; the question is just whether, in your metaphor, who is driving the Ferrari. I claim that the drivers are Dave Sifry of Technorati and Page and Brin of Google, not Doc Searls. I also agree with your description of the desire behind the argument, the desire to have Searls (for example) &#8220;recognize the influential power they have and the amount to which they tend to link inside their circle and that other worthy people donâ€™t get that link love.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
