<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Debunking Dale Cone&#8217;s Pyramid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chrislott.org/story/debunking-dale-cones-pyramid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chrislott.org/story/debunking-dale-cones-pyramid/</link>
	<description>Musings on education, techology, and life..</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Jul 2010 16:19:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug Noon</title>
		<link>http://chrislott.org/story/debunking-dale-cones-pyramid/comment-page-1/#comment-116308</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug Noon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 02:03:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chrislott.org/2007/11/15/debunking-dale-cones-pyramid/#comment-116308</guid>
		<description>When I was a swimming instructor, I used to joke about how it would be if we tried teaching people to swim by demonstrating what to do, and having them take notes. 

You&#039;re correct, that we all recognize the value of experience in learning. The argument against the Cone of Experience presented there could be characterized as the &lt;a href=&quot;http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_appearance.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;appearance vs. reality&lt;/a&gt; challenge. I like to use the same tactic when people talk about &quot;learning&quot; as if it was s monolithic concept that can be easily generalized. It&#039;s tough to make any claims about learning if you don&#039;t clearly define what that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was a swimming instructor, I used to joke about how it would be if we tried teaching people to swim by demonstrating what to do, and having them take notes. </p>
<p>You&#8217;re correct, that we all recognize the value of experience in learning. The argument against the Cone of Experience presented there could be characterized as the <a href="http://atheism.about.com/library/glossary/general/bldef_appearance.htm" rel="nofollow">appearance vs. reality</a> challenge. I like to use the same tactic when people talk about &#8220;learning&#8221; as if it was s monolithic concept that can be easily generalized. It&#8217;s tough to make any claims about learning if you don&#8217;t clearly define what that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
